Comparison of Mercury, Aneroid and Digital Sphygmomanometer in Community Setting
A study was conducted to compare the accuracy of mercury, aneroid and digital sphygmomanometers in a community setting. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the three types of devices in terms of accuracy. However, digital sphygmomanometers were found to be more user-friendly than mercury and aneroid devices.
When it comes to portability, digital sphygmomanometers score higher than the other two types. This is because they are usually small and lightweight, making them easy to carry around in a medical bag. In addition, their user-friendly design makes it quicker and easier for trained healthcare professionals to take readings.
The cost of a digital sphygmomanometer is likely to be higher than that of mercury and aneroid devices, but this should not be the deciding factor when it comes to choosing which type of device to use in a community setting. Instead, consider factors such as accuracy, portability, ease-of-use and safety before making your decision.
In summary, when it comes to accuracy and portability, digital sphygmomanometers are the most suitable choice for use in a community setting. They are user-friendly and can provide accurate readings quickly. However, cost should not be the deciding factor when making your decision – instead consider factors such as accuracy, portability, ease-of-use and safety.
Visit Santamedical website for their high-quality available sphygmomanometers.